Supreme court: stray dogs case

Supreme Court Reserves Judgment on Stray Dogs Case – Full Details

New Delhi – The Supreme Court of India has reserved its judgment on the long-standing dispute over the management and relocation of stray dogs in Delhi. This contentious issue has pitted animal welfare organisations against municipal bodies, raising a nationwide debate on public safety versus animal rights.

The matter was heard extensively, with both sides presenting compelling arguments. While one camp emphasised the fundamental rights and humane treatment of animals, the other underscored the urgent need to safeguard citizens from dog bites, road accidents, and health hazards.


What Is the Dispute?

Delhi is currently home to over 1 million stray dogs, a number that has been steadily increasing over the years. This has led to several public concerns, including:

  1. Dog Bite Incidents – A significant portion of victims are children and the elderly.
  2. Road Accidents – Stray dog packs often block traffic or cause collisions.
  3. Hygiene and Sanitation Issues – Open food waste and unhygienic conditions attract more strays.

Municipal corporations and resident groups have urged the removal or relocation of these dogs to reduce public risk.

However, animal welfare organisations such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) have strongly opposed such measures. They argue that the CNVR methodCatch, Neuter, Vaccinate, and Release – is a more ethical and sustainable solution.


Arguments Before the Supreme Court

Animal Welfare Groups’ Position

  • Killing or Relocating Is Illegal – Under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, harming stray dogs is a punishable offence.
  • Sterilisation and Vaccination Are Key – Only large-scale sterilisation combined with rabies vaccination can reduce the population in the long term.
  • Ecological Impact – Removing stray dogs disrupts the urban ecosystem, as they help control pests and waste.

Municipal Corporations & Citizens’ Position

  • Public Health Threat – Stray dogs are carriers of rabies and other diseases, endangering human life.
  • Rising Attacks – Despite the 2015 SC ban on killing dogs, the problem has worsened.
  • Enforcement Challenges – Insufficient funding, lack of trained staff, and poor monitoring make sterilisation programs ineffective.

What Happened in Court?

During the hearings, the bench acknowledged the sensitivity of the matter and the need for a balanced approach. The judges pointed out that while human safety cannot be compromised, animal rights must also be upheld under Indian law.

The Court indicated that its upcoming decision will likely focus on:

  1. Strengthening the CNVR Program – Ensuring systematic sterilisation and vaccination.
  2. Clear Accountability – Differentiating between attacks by pet dogs and stray dogs.
  3. Funding Municipal Bodies – Providing adequate resources for humane stray management.

Possible Supreme Court Directions

  • Mandating annual sterilisation targets for each state.
  • Introducing microchipping to track sterilised and vaccinated strays.
  • Encouraging adoption of stray dogs through awareness drives.
  • Penalising municipal bodies for negligence in stray dog management.

Existing Indian Laws on Stray Dogs

  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 – Prohibits killing or inflicting cruelty on animals, including strays.
  • Supreme Court Order of 2015 – Instructs local bodies to sterilise and vaccinate dogs, then release them back into their original territories.
  • Model Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023 – Issued by the Central Government to provide updated guidelines for humane population control.

Why the Case Matters Nationwide

This case goes beyond Delhi. India’s stray dog population is estimated at over 6 crore (60 million). The Supreme Court’s verdict will likely set a legal precedent for every state and city struggling with the same issue.

It will also influence public health policy, urban sanitation programs, and animal rights advocacy in the coming years.


Current Interim Measures

Until the verdict is delivered, the Supreme Court has directed municipal bodies to manage stray dogs without causing them harm. The Court has also urged all stakeholders to work collaboratively and avoid actions that could escalate tensions between residents and animal activists.


Public Questions & Awareness

Q1: Can stray dogs be adopted?
Yes. Any individual or organisation can legally adopt a stray dog after ensuring proper vaccination and sterilisation.

Q2: What should you do if bitten by a dog?
Immediately wash the wound with soap and running water, apply antiseptic, and seek anti-rabies vaccination within 24 hours.

Q3: How can citizens help?
By supporting sterilisation drives, avoiding food waste in public spaces, and reporting injured or sick strays to NGOs.


Conclusion

The stray dog debate represents one of the most complex urban challenges in India – balancing public safety with animal welfare. The Supreme Court’s decision will be crucial in defining how India handles this sensitive issue in the future.

Whether it leads to tighter regulations, better funding for sterilisation, or increased adoption drives, one thing is certain – the verdict will impact millions of people and animals alike.


If you found this article useful, share it and also consult articles. At NEWSWELL24.COM we keep such important and reliable information

Leave a Comment

WhatsApp Channel Join Now
Telegram Group Join Now
Instagram Group Join Now